Which term matches the definition? The facts and circumstances are such that a reasonable person would hold the belief.

The term that matches the definition given—where the facts and circumstances lead a reasonable person to hold a belief—is "reasonable belief." This concept is essential in various legal and logical contexts, indicating that a person's belief is based on sufficient factual information and is justifiable from the perspective of a rational individual.

"Reasonable belief" is crucial in scenarios such as legal actions, professional evaluations, and assessments of threat levels, where subjective viewpoints must be grounded in objective reality. Therefore, a reasonable belief implies that a belief is not just a personal assumption but is supported by an interpretation of evidence that a prudent and logical person would typically agree upon.

In contrast, reasonable doubt pertains specifically to the level of certainty required in criminal law to secure a conviction, which does not align with the broader scope of holding a belief based on available facts. Probable cause relates to the justification needed for law enforcement to act, such as making an arrest or conducting a search, rather than a belief standard based on personal conjecture. A credible threat involves a specific threat of harm that can be substantiated, which does not directly correlate with the concept of belief in a general sense.

Thus, "reasonable belief" is clearly the term that best fits the provided definition, emphasizing