Which statement is true regarding potential risk indicators (PRIs) used by the DoD Insider Threat Programs?

The statement that each indicator should measure only one thing is correct because this specificity helps to clearly define and identify potential risks. When an indicator is focused on a single item, it allows for more precise monitoring and evaluation. This clarity minimizes the risk of confusion or misinterpretation of the data being collected. By having a clear, singular focus for each PRI, organizations can effectively track changes and patterns that are directly related to insider threats.

In this approach, the effectiveness of an insider threat program is enhanced as it relies on concrete data to guide decision-making and responses. This specificity is vital in the context of security and risk management, particularly for organizations like the Department of Defense, which operate in high-stakes environments where understanding the nuances of behavioral changes can be critical.

The other scenarios do not align with best practices for managing and interpreting risk indicators. Indicators that attempt to measure multiple things can lead to ambiguity and fail to pinpoint specific issues, while relying solely on behavioral observations may overlook other important factors. Additionally, individual managers setting their own indicators can lead to inconsistency and a lack of standardized practices across an organization.