To ensure actions taken do not infringe on constitutional liberties, Insider Threat Programs must comply with what?

The correct choice emphasizes the need for Insider Threat Programs to comply with accepted potential risk indicators to ensure that their actions do not infringe upon constitutional liberties. This approach is crucial because potential risk indicators provide established frameworks and guidelines that define what behavior or signs may signal an insider threat while respecting individual rights. By adhering to these accepted standards, organizations can create a balance between ensuring security and upholding the constitutional protections afforded to individuals, thus minimizing the risk of arbitrary or unjust actions.

Focusing on accepted potential risk indicators also helps organizations to tailor their practices in a manner that is both legally compliant and effective. Such indicators are often derived from legal considerations, industry best practices, and ethical considerations, ensuring that monitoring activities are justified and proportionate.

In contrast, the other choices do not adequately address the balance between security measures and constitutional rights. Variability of risk assessments might lead to inconsistent practices that could jeopardize individual liberties. Relying solely on company policies could result in a lack of alignment with broader legal standards. Furthermore, while federal regulations certainly guide operations, they must be interpreted alongside potential risk indicators to ensure a comprehensive understanding of constitutional implications.