Insider Threat Programs must distinguish between which two types of disclosures?

The distinction between unauthorized disclosures and whistleblowing activities is crucial in Insider Threat Programs because it addresses the different motivations and implications behind each type of action. Unauthorized disclosures refer to the unapproved sharing of sensitive or confidential information, typically with harmful intent or negligence. This kind of behavior poses a direct threat to organizational security and integrity.

On the other hand, whistleblowing activities involve reporting improper or illegal conduct within an organization, often in good faith, with the intent of rectifying wrongdoing or preventing harm to others. Whistleblowers are generally protected by laws and regulations that encourage reporting to promote ethical behavior and accountability within organizations.

Understanding this distinction is essential for an Insider Threat Program, as it allows organizations to create frameworks that identify, manage, and respond appropriately to both types of disclosures. Recognizing the motivations behind these actions helps in implementing the right measures to protect sensitive information while also fostering an environment where ethical reporting is encouraged. This understanding prevents the chilling effect that might arise if employees fear reprisals for reporting legitimate concerns.